Four steps, from the first conversation to a staffing recommendation you can put in front of your board. You supply the facts. The method does the same arithmetic every time.
The work on your side is gathering numbers your teams already keep. There is nothing to install.
We talk with your security and facilities leaders about the building, how it is used and where your concerns are.
Your team gathers the 24 facility inputs in four groups: the building, crime and safety, incidents, and volume.
The fixed scoring method turns the inputs into a risk score, the drivers behind it and a staffing recommendation.
When a new period of data is ready, you update the assessment. The earlier results stay on file.
Three results, in the same form for every facility. Figures below are from a sample hospital.
On a scale of 0 to 100, with the inputs pushing it up named alongside their numbers. The sample hospital scores 53.
The square-footage starting point most hospitals use today, shown so you can see what the risk factors change. For the sample hospital, floor area alone suggests 33 roving FTE.
The risk-weighted recommendation in FTE, split into fixed posts and roving, and shown per shift. The sample hospital needs 23 officers on every shift.
Built for hospitals, clinics, elder care, rehabilitation, behavioral health and specialty care.
The same 24 inputs and the same method apply to each, so a health system can compare its sites on one scale.
Thirty minutes with your figures: the score, the reasons and the staffing.
